Reply to Boik and Kruse
نویسنده
چکیده
We find ourselves agreeing with much of what Kruse says in his reply to Why Likelihood?, and we appreciate his clarification on other points. Boik, on the other hand, believes there is a satisfactory Bayesian solution to the problem of model selection. He also believes that the Akaike solution is flawed. We discuss these two points in sections 2 and 3. In addition, we disagree with Boik about several points of interpretation. We discuss these in section 1.
منابع مشابه
Empirical Bayes 1 An Examination of the Robustness of the Empirical Bayes and Other Approaches for Testing Main and Interaction Effects in Repeated Measures Designs by
Boik (1997) presented an empirical Bayes (EB) approach to the analysis of repeated measurements. The EB approach is a blend of the conventional univariate and multivariate approaches. Specifically, in the EB approach, the underlying covariance matrix is estimated by a weighted sum of the univariate and multivariate estimators. In addition to demonstrating that his approach controls test size an...
متن کاملAn R Package for Assessing Drug Synergism/Antagonism
This introduction to the R package mixlow is a (slightly) modified version of Boik and Narasimhan (2010), published in the Journal of Statistical Software. Synergistic and antagonistic drug interactions are important to consider when developing mixtures of anticancer or other types of drugs. Boik, Newman, and Boik (2008) proposed the MixLow method as an alternative to the Median-Effect method o...
متن کامل